Abolition of Death Penalty

ABOLITION OF DEATH penalization DEFINITION According to Republic pr interpretise No. 7659, finish penalisation is a penalization for discourtesys that are heinous for creation grievous, odious and hateful dispatchenses and which, by debate of their inherent or manifest wickedness, viciousness, brutality and perversity are repugnant and extortionate to the common standards and norms of decency and morality in a near, civilized and decreeed society. cobblers last penalisation is a cruel, futile and dangerous penalization for very serious lands and with due juridical dish. According toAmnesty International, a worldwide yarn-dyement of people working for internationally recognized human recompenses shoemakers last penalisation is the ultimate, permanent denial of human remedys. Thus, they worked towards revokeing it in order to peculiarity the cycle of force created by a dodge pierce with economic and racial bias and impair with human error. BACKGR OUND Next, I would akin to present a brief reason on dying penalization in the Philippines. In 1987, the Philippines made history by becoming the first Asian soil in modern durations to abolish the s come aboutping point punishment for all crimes.How of all time, half-dozen classs later, in 1993, the end penalization was reintroduced in the Philippines for 46 different offences. such(prenominal) of those are justcher, rape, parricide, infanticide and qualified bribery, among others. Executions resumed in 1999 until year 2000 when spring president Estrada announced a moratorium on executions. This has been continued by received President Arroyo, in practice, throughout her presidency. direct, below her rule, the stopping point penalization is again abolished . military position I am in raise of abolishing the devastation penalty law in the Philippines.Allow me to present my arguments. First, it violates the right to live. Second, it is a very cruel practic e. Third, it is anti-poor. Last, cobblers last penalty defeats its purpose. ARGUMENTS First, the hypocrisy of death penalty violates a psyches right to live. Article III prick 1 of the 1987 Constitution, otherwise cognize asthe agitate of Rights, states that No psyche shall be divest of brio, liberty, or property By oblige death penalty, the right of a venomous to live is creation violated. Furthermore, it is a k directn fact that majority of Filipinos are Catholics.As said, we control unrivaled of the worlds too largest Christian populations. According tothe 10 Commandmentsof the Church, thou shall not kill. Therefore, nobody is condition the right to commit the lives of others. Whether that soulfulness is a criminal or not, nobody has the right to play God and handle the purport that He has given. Filipinos should respect and value the sanctity of human life and uphold the sexual morality and religious doctrines that are expected of us as a dominant Christian nation. Second, it is a very cruel, inhuman and irreversible practice.It is very cruel and in human be display suit of clothes persons are killed. This al maven is proof. Once a person is killed, the act female genitalianot be reversed. Third, death penalty is anti-poor. In a rude like the Philippines with a very slow, mosttimes inefficient, unfair and raw judicial system, death penalty is simply not viable. bulk of the 1200 people on the death lyric are poor. Maybe, for some, cosmos thither is what they deserve. hardly for many, it is poverty that brought them there. not both cardinal in that actors line should die.Many are simply there be precedent they ran against some filthy rich and powerful person or they could not afford to prepare a good lawyer to apply them. A theatre of operations showed that death penalty is anti-poor as the underprivileged who potbellynot afford the operate of competent counsels are oftentimes the ones convicted of death penalty. Studies beat shown that the death penalty is disproportionately imposed on the poo symmetry, least educated and most vulnerable members of society. It takes the lives of offenders who qualification otherwise subscribe to been restored. Lastly, death penalty does not live up to its purpose.It is not able to serve its purpose which is to thwart crimes and to preserve peace and order. According to the President, in a letter she sent to Senate President Franklin M. Drilon, the imposition of death penalty was shown to have not served its principal purpose of in effect deterring the commission of heinous crimes. Clearly, even with death penalty imposed, the Philippines still continued to pouch high and ri depravityg crime place in the country. If death penalty is effective, there should have been less crimes but it is instead the contrary.Also, there are no concrete evidence like studies or tests that could assay that the imposition of death penalty sincerely prevents crime thus mainta ining peace and order in the country. SUMMARY To cap off this essay, death penalty is the punishment served to those who have committed crimes that are heinous for being grievous, odious and hateful offenses and which, by reason of their inherent or manifest wickedness, viciousness, atrocity and perversity are repugnant and dire to the common standards and norms of decency and morality in a just now, civilized and ordered society. I am in favor of the abolition of death penalty because first, its imposition violates the right to live. Second, it is a very cruel, inhuman and irreversible act. Third, death penalty is anti-poor. Lastly, death penalty does not serve its purpose of preventing crimes and preserving peace and order. I wish to end this speech by saying that I commend the sex act for passing a legislation craft for the abolition of death penalty. As CBCP puts it, this stair has finally led the country to move from justness that kills to nicety that heals. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ How To Put To last oddment penalisation Death penalization as we all manage is a Legalized form of Killing or withdraw it is a legalized SIN because to kill or to murder what we all know is sin and some called an act of killing or murder an EVIL act. Does the murder of Death penalization exploit life, justice and end heinous crimes in the Philippines? I dont look so.But the forward-looking Vice President of the Philippines Jejomar Binay thinks it so as he utter his desire to playact congest death penalty in the Philippine in his outburst ruttish response when he attended the showing of the brutally dispatch son of lawyer Oliver Lozano at media interview. Dapat ibalik na ang death penalty ( It is high time to bring back death penalty) -Jejomar Binay Death Penalty has been in the Philippines since the Marcos administration but was solely upstage at the time of former Philippine president Corazon Aquino and was revived during amongst the administration of former Philippine presidents Fidel V.Ramos and Joseph Ejercito Estrada and was removed again at the time of the novel former Philippine President Gloria Macapagal Arroyo because of the geological fault and failure of the execution of the First ever Filipino to receive death penalty by lethal injection social lion Echagaray for the crime of rape which was found in conclusion that he is not wicked or was unprejudiced of the crime he was accuse of and the true rapist is at large and unknown. What a big slap on the Philippines justice system, thus it was removed.It was the roar and pro-death penalty campaigns in the media which influenced unlearned people that social lion Echagaray succumb into untimely death beforehand he was prove innocent so sad that people at that time were driven by brainless animosity to revenge for the rape victim. But now Vice president Binay, is wishing to bring it back? To repeat t his sad scenario just to tell to the world that we do justice, WHAT JUSTICE Does he think salubrious when he utters a wish for its resurgence or is he just wound up overwhelmed at the wake of the brutally murdered son of attorney Oliver Lozano?There are many bad consequences to the justice system of the Philippines when Death penalty leave be rekindled its frightening presence in the Philippines. to a greater extent injustices will be engendered in the end by mistakenly sentencing to death innocent poor Filipinos and foreigners once they could not proven themselves innocent at the allowed period of presenting evidences and proofs that one is not guilty of the crime being accused of and by the influence of unbelieving brainless and heartless wrathful masses.Moreover, if one is financially poor and destitute how dissolve one find a real attorney that cannot be bought by silver, to expect ones innocence? authentically more innocent lives will be shredded unjustly by this dam n capital punishment. Furthermore, we already know that the financially rich and wealthy prosecuted and accused ones could mistreat justice and could buy bills-face attorneys, lawyers and judges.Therefore, is this death penalty will stop heinous crimes or will just added more unjust crimes perpetrated by its revival and presence, wherein death penalty is too a heinous crime concealed by the law of fair play of the state or country. For death penalty is an act of torturing a person until it dies, which has no difference with the sadistic and psycho behavior of seemingly soulless criminals who excruciate first their victims before they eventually kill their victims.Death penalty is NOT HUMANE ACT, or else it is BEASTIAL ACT. Bestial act (death penalty) against bestial act (heinous crimes) will not unclutter or eliminate crimes within the country or state. Fear is not the answer and will not uproot the main cause of crimes. it just controls but never solves it just control the symptoms but never cures and heals. JC tormented and received Death Penalty A more humanitarian solution is the underlying to solve bestial problems like crimes for every effect (activities) there is a cause (reason for the activity).The cause should be addressed to solve the problem and not controlling the set up without removing the cause For the effects will not end if the cause is not removed. think Filipinos, your National Hero, Dr. Jose Rizal was a victim of Death penalty or capital punishment which is Firing squad during the Spanish production line but he is innocent. repute also Filipinos, your earnest colonial religious immortal Jesus Christ was also a victim of Death penalty or capital punishment which is crucifixion but Jesus Christ is innocent.Remember also Filipinos, your beloved fellow Filipinos that have suffered Death Penalty on other countries by intermission are also innocent. Remember Filipinos, the human-centred in you and dont let the bestial pick up y our human side. Remember Filipinos, to Love and Understand and dont let Hate and Wrath overtake that Love and understanding within your soul. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ The Death Penalty, Good or Bad? A few days ago the knob of Police for West Orange, New tee shirt spoke out about the negative effects of the death penalty.James Abbott (police chief) stated that the death penalty is broken beyond holiday resort and that the extra money spent engage executions could be better spent on crime prevention and the needs of victims. I no acheer believe that you can fix the death penalty. Six months of study opened my eyes to its shocking reality. I learned that the death penalty throws millions of dollars round off the drain money that I could be putting directly to work trash crime every day turn pull victims families through a long and torturous process that only exacerbates their pain. Now in New island of Jer sey, the death penalty has been outlawed. The death penalty is being replaced with life in prison with no encounter of parole. Is this really gonna lower the costs that the death penalty brings about? On top of that, could the money used for the death penalty really be used to overhaul change peoples attitudes on how they act? Currently, the state of New Jersey has spent over a crap of a billion dollars on the death penalty in the last 30 years.Would this be personify money to rehabilitate a murderer? Personally I think trying to have a murderer rehabilitated is a waste of time. I know there is the saying that everyone deserves a second chance but in the case of murder, there is no 2nd chance for the murdered. Why should we not take anothers life if he murdered another life? Not only for cost reasons do I think life in prison would be a waste of money but also ethically I think life imprisonment is cruel.I know there are a carry on of ethical dilemmas involved but would we as humans be cruel enough to torture another human for the rest of his life in prison? To me, culmination someones life fast and quick seems more human than dragging out a sentence for but number of years. Also, even if the man or woman was not being tortured in prison, we would be spending money on keeping 1 person alive who murdered another. Where is the justice merchant ship that _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ There should be justice in this world.There are many forms of justice in this world but in the case of murdering another human being, I think there should only be one final verdict. A murder should be tried then if found guilty put to death. No one can bring back a all in(p) person. A family member who lost a loved one because another person murdered them would want justice for the murders crime. Article III. Bill of Rights Section 1. No person shall be deprived of life, liberty, or property without due proce ss of law, nor shall any person be denied the equal protection of the laws.